I predict that Obama will show up on the wire services in a photo holding a dead bird that he “killed.” Otherwise, this effort is going to look a little thin.
Barack Obama did not hunt or fish as a child. He lives in a big city. And as an Illinois state legislator and a U.S. senator, he consistently backed gun control legislation.
But he is nevertheless making a play for pro-gun voters in rural Pennsylvania.
By highlighting his background in constitutional law and downplaying his voting record, Obama is engaging in a quiet but targeted drive to win over an important constituency that on the surface might seem hostile to his views.
The need to craft a strategy aimed at pro-gun voters underscores the potency of the issue in Pennsylvania, which claims one of the nation’s highest per capita membership rates in the National Rifle Association.
The Junior Senator, who has voted for almost every gun control measure to come before any legislative body he’s belonged to, is looking to get the typical white people in the rural areas of Pennsylvania to vote for him. These particular useful rubes happen to be more likely to own guns than the average person, but Obama refuses to concede their votes to Hillary. Instead, he’s going to try to blatantly bullshit them by highlighting his support of the right of sportsmen to own guns for the purpose of hunting. Not homeowners for the purpose of keeping some criminal piece of shit from raping their daughter mind you, but if you want to go duck hunting, you’ll be allowed to get your 12-gauge out of the mandatory gun safe, remove the federally mandated trigger lock, travel to the nearest government designated hunting area, and shoot the federally determined bag limit of the non-protected avian species of your choice. Cuz he’s a pro-Second-Amendment candidate like that.
This seems to be part of a larger effort by “progressive” policy advocates to try to “take back” the gun issue. The article goes on to talk about the “pro-gun” Democrats who are backing Obama. How in hell anyone who has the slightest affection for gun ownership could contemplate casting a vote that would give the Democratic Party more control over government power I don’t know, but the article lays on a healthy helping of the idea that the gun issue is about the freedom to hunt. It’s a painfully obvious and familiar tactic to anyone who has followed this issue at all, but it doesn’t have to work on the die-hard pro-Second-Amendment contingent. Gun control advocates only need convince enough of the “sportsmen” that they should support “common sense” gun control by pointing out that it won’t effect their precious shotguns and hunting rifles and they can get enough legislation passed to force defenselessness on the law-abiding populace.
I would wager every dollar I have to my name that when the Constitutional Congress gathered in Philadelphia and debated the issues surrounding the Second Amendment, no one in that room had so much as a single thought about using firearms to shoot a fucking duck for recreation. Not one goddamn flicker of an idea.